F a x S e r v i c e

To: George Brauchler From: Steve Douglas, Gartin

Fax: Relay: 739-9824 Pages: 3

Phone: Message: 364-0403 Date: November 15, 1996

Re: Impeding Justice - Discovery CC: File, Media List

¨

Notice of Civil Rights Violations and Criminal Complaint - Obstructing Justice

l Comments:

Following is Plaintiff’s Verified Complaint of Obstruction of Justice. This notice is filed VIA FAX, pursuant to and in compliance with, Colorado law as follows:

Colorado Court Rules Section 1-25 FACSIMILE COPIES

2. Facsimile copies which conform with the quality requirements specified in C.R.C.P. 10(d)(1) may be filed with the court in lieu of the original document. Once filed with the court, the facsimile copy shall be treated as an original for all court purposes. If a facsimile copy is filed in lieu of the original document, the attorney or party filing the facsimile shall retain the original document for production to the court, if requested to do so.

4. Any facsimile copy transmitted directly to the court shall be accompanied by a cover sheet which states the title of the document, case number, number of pages, identity and voice telephone number of transmitter and any instructions.

Colorado Court Rules Rule 10. Form and Quality of Pleadings, Motions and Other Papers

    1. General Rule Regarding Paper Size, Format, and Spacing.

All documents originated after the effective date of this rule shall meet the following criteria:

    1. Paper Size and Quality: Only documents which are clear and legible and are on permanent plain 8 1/2 by 11 inch paper shall be filed.

(38) "Send" in connection with any writing or notice means to deposit in the mail or deliver for transmission by any other usual means of communication with postage or cost of transmission provided for and properly addressed and in the case of an instrument to an address specified thereon or otherwise agreed, or if there be none to any address reasonable under the circumstances. The receipt of any writing or notice within the time at which it would have arrived if properly sent has the effect of a proper sending.

Note: This Document is addressed to the above Party, if this document has been received in error, please return or call 364-0403

 

Attention: George Brauchler, Assistant Jefferson County District Attorney

Date: March 11th, 1997

Reference: Discovery Extorted from this Sovereign from your office

Subject: Appropriate Federal Charges for criminal extortion in conspiracy

Dear Mr. George Brauchler:

Your office has again damaged this Sovereign by refusing to accept CASH money for "Discovery" that is by Law required to be attached to any lawful Warrant. Your office additionally and knowingly sequestered documents containing material evidence to the questions before the Court in the listed controversies and more, unknown at this time because of the Persecution’s willful concealment of material facts in these cases.

Regarding Jefferson County Cases:

Please understand that your actions are noted and compared with the obligations to truth and justice that you swore in your Oath of Office.

Criminal Federal Charges may stem from U.S.C.A. Title 18, section 1621 and 1622 - material perjury and Subornation to perjury and Title 42, sections 1986, 1985, and 1983

These charges include, but are not limited to:

and other such violations and criminal acts by Federal Statute by the above named persons and with others.

These and other such acts and violations are supported by independent eyewitness, partisan eyewitnesses, court documents, filed records, police reports and such. I have not yet seen any investigation from authorities in any proper fashion. The facts are self evident, the crimes are continuing, and damages are accruing.

You are encouraged to investigate through any means available to you.

Some specific statutes which these persons violated can be found at:

    1. U.S.C.A. Title 42, section 1986- Defendants had knowledge of the law and did or witnessed wrongs and neglected to correct and/or prevent these wrongs from damaging the Family Gartin.
    2. U.S.C.A. 1985- Defendants acted in concert and conspiracy under color of law to deprive rights
    3. U.S.C.A. 1983- Defendants caused damages. The neglects of Defendants violated Statutes that bind officers:
    4. U.S.C.A. Title 18, section 241- Conspiracy against rights
    5. U.S.C.A. 242 - Deprivation of rights
    6. U.S.C.A. 872 - Extortion
    7. U.S.C.A. 1621 - Perjury of Oath of Office

The rules of Court show that Defendant’s actions granted no jurisdiction over the Plaintiff in these lower court cases. See Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

I. Rule 19 and 12(b)(7) No joinder of party

II. Rule 12(b)(6) Failed to State a Claim

III. Rule 12(b)(1) and (2) Lack’s personam and subject matter jurisdiction

Please FAX the "Affidavit of Warrantless Arrest" so proudly collaborated by conspirators and by Don Estep in the Discovery materials extorted for a fee by check only from this Sovereign Colorado Citizen.

FAXes are continually received at 739-9824 * 24 hours a day. Voice Message 364-0403

Either the Prosecution is knowingly concealing information or has failed by incompetence to provide proper Discovery as required by his "job description" as District Prosecutor, or other titles of nobility repugnant to the Colorado Constitution.

 

Thank you and God bless you.

Very Truly,

Steve Douglas, Gartin